Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 541 - 560 of 1,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by Alex Gasser
Rogers, Jr. issued an initial determination (“ID”) on October 14, 2009 in which he found no violation of Section 337 because the four asserted patents were either invalid or not infringed, and because no industries existed in the United States for any of the patents asserted at the hearing. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Judge Rogers concurred, reasoning that while a habeas judge has the power to order the release of a Guantanamo prisoner into the United States, that power should not have been exercised in Kiyemba in light of the offer of repatriation elsewhere. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The cover art and subtitle suggest that the narrative is centered on United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm by Andrew Raff
" The complaint: Scorpio Music v Willis [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Scalia challenged Waxman to name a single precedent in which a non-citizen held outside the sovereign territory of the United States (or England) was entitled to habeas even though no statute so provided. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
No special legislation in the United States was necessary to make it effective. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
This symposium essay attempts to remedy that defect, analyzing Pressley in light of the precedent upon which it relied (the Court's 1952 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 5:58 am
WTO Claims (Counts IV, V) The plaintiff alleges that UIGEA is void because it is ultra vires of, and otherwise inconsistent with, the foreign trade obligations of the United States. [read post]