Search for: "United States v. Small" Results 541 - 560 of 6,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2014, 11:55 am by The Law Offices of Susan L. Hartman
This is the very question that is currently before the Supreme Court of the United States, (see David Riley v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
In the complaint, Plaintiffs explained that for nearly half a decade, staffing companies and small businesses in the United States have been hiring temporary and long-term employees for specialty positions on H-1B visas. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm by David Cheifetz
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:42 pm
On June 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm by Leland E. Beck
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations:  A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm by Leland E. Beck
” DHS & DOJ – Asylum Grants & Revocations:  A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had no authority to terminate the asylum status of petitioner in Nijjar v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Caroline Fredrickson Look at the name of this panel—it certainly seems to sum up the predicament the United States faces in this perilous moment. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
And in the context of this diversity, the United States has not been striven by religious civil wars. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  So said the United States Supreme Court today in Sexton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Eugene Volokh
" Registration also enables the trademark holder "to stop the importation into the United States of articles bearing an infringing mark. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]