Search for: "United States v. Steven Stands"
Results 541 - 560
of 844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
I'm not sure where I stand on them as a policy matter. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
Many commentators, including my good friends Randy Barnett and Larry Solum, have praised Justice Scalia's opinion in Heller v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
In sum, Defendant was competent to stand trial or otherwise answer the charges against him.U.S. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
After all, a protest outside a judge’s home can be at least as intimidating as a protest outside a courthouse.Yet Cox seems difficult to reconcile with the later decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
Trump (IRAP), we may soon find where the Supreme Court stands on the question. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm
(By the way, that’s a fine excuse to note the most important constitutional development of the week: As great and significant as the Court’s analysis on Article III standing was in Monday’s landmark Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:01 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm
United States, Romer v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
" Human Rights Watch says the United States has 2,574 inmates serving life terms for crimes they committed before age 18. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 3:47 am
Sage Dining Services, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:00 pm
The question in United States v. [read post]
