Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1" Results 541 - 560 of 2,513
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The leading case, from the Eleventh Circuit, requires a showing that (1) there was direct false advertising, and (2) “the defendant contributed to that conduct either by knowingly inducing or causing the conduct, or by materially participating in it. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:58 am by Charla Bizios Stevens
  However, the cost and disruption of having to defend such claims could be crippling to a company already facing the challenges associated with a return to some semblance of normal business activity. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm by Giles Peaker
” The letter criticises Southwark for applying a test to determine eligibility for band 1 which is whether the overcrowding was caused “as a result of natural increase, this not being a criterion contained within the housing allocations policy for band 1. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:35 am by SHG
Who does their job, runs their business, appears in court to defend their clients? [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:02 pm
We read even the report by your newspapers yesterday that your scientists, medical advisers, even warned your government that there might be a virus unknown to us, much earlier, last year. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am by Shea Denning
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in (1) determining that a witness for the State was competent to testify despite his impairment and (2) denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial based on the testimony from the impaired witness. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
Any other civil action or claim against the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort, except that the district courts shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action or claim against the United States founded upon any express or implied contract… [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:24 am by Steven Boutwell
A licensor who has rejected a license will not be required to perform any obligations under the license, such as defending its licensee from infringement claims, other than to refrain from suing the licensee for infringement. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
District Court for the Eastern District of California held: “Because the list of Confidential Information is not exhaustive, and because the trade secrets are an unknown subset of the indefinite Confidential Information, plaintiff does not sufficiently identify anything”  (2019 WL 5862594 (E.D. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
  Without further ado, here’s the current list of the top 12 wealthiest, practicing lawyers: 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff testified that on April 1, 2016, he and defendant each paid a $109 entrance fee to participate in a head-to-head DFS contest on the FanDuel website. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
And just as courts have increasingly recognized the value of monetary damages over injunctions in patent infringement cases under the eBay Inc. v, MercExchange LLC framework, we think government patent use under section 1498 will often be preferable to a buyout in a fast-moving crisis.1. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Erik Manukyan
Robins, standing requires that plaintiffs (1) “suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
COVID-19 has again exposed the power of the space, which marks the confines of the legalization of politics, the judicialization of political contests around fundamental issues of morals, ethics, social norms, and international relations. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
  The judge discharged injunctions that he had granted against Persons Unknown based on the principles derived from the decision of the Court of Appeal in Canada Goose [2020] EWCA Civ 303. [read post]