Search for: "Utter v. Utter" Results 541 - 560 of 2,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.* However, as the Court of Appeals said in Stega v New York Downtown Hosp., 31 NY3d 661, an allegedly defamatory "statement is subject to a qualified privilege when it is fairly made by a person in the discharge of some public or private duty, legal or moral, or in the conduct of his own affairs, in a matter where his [or her] interest is concerned. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.* However, as the Court of Appeals said in Stega v New York Downtown Hosp., 31 NY3d 661, an allegedly defamatory "statement is subject to a qualified privilege when it is fairly made by a person in the discharge of some public or private duty, legal or moral, or in the conduct of his own affairs, in a matter where his [or her] interest is concerned. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:03 pm by familoo
It is here: Jones v Kernott – Ending the big debate? [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:17 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This is utter nonsense.A decision should receive no more respect as precedent than it gave to precedent. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Pix Credit here Lo que fue en su tiempo una revolución de jóvenes valientes, audaces, creativos, se convertía con el paso del tiempo, de su institucionalización y aferramiento a los mecanismos del poder, en algo esencialemente conservador hasta transformarse en una gerontorcracia renuente a cualquier renovación efectiva. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 1:48 pm
Accordingly, I believe it was error to admit the challenged statement under the excited utterance exception. [read post]