Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes"
Results 541 - 559
of 559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 5:27 pm
Noting that Bass Pro’s argument appeared to implicate due process concerns under the Seventh Amendment, the Panel held that Bass Pro’s reliance on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
The Background: The DFEH’s new authority came on the heels of two game changing decisions – Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
In addressing commonality, the court applied the recent decision in Wal-mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:01 am
These issues will likely become even worse as the case progresses, as the court, will ultimately need to sort out countless allegations regarding hiring, training, transfer, promotion, and discharge on an individual basis, a process the Supreme Court rejected in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:46 am
The court further took issue with many of the plaintiffs’ suggested common issues of fact, drawing on the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:09 am
It then rejected the argument that nothing in Rule 23 prohibits a negotiation class as failing to recognize the Supreme Court’s guidance in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
And as the Supreme Court pointed out in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:28 pm
This case is significant because it is the first known California appellate decision reviewing a trial verdict in an overtime misclassification case, where the trial court employed one of the purported “innovative procedural tools” (statistical sampling) to manage class action trials referenced by the California Supreme Court in Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
Schleicher v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:06 am
In addition to converting their class certification rulings into class action settlements with higher values and pay-outs, plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm
The report also makes an unusually direct pitch for the EEOC to be the litigation partner of choice in overcoming mandatory employment arbitration agreements and the challenges to the plaintiffs’ bar of bringing statistical disparate impact cases under Title VII in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision rendering class certification based on mere statistical evidence untenable in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
” Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:06 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:02 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of 59yo Store Mgr's age/discharge claim> Drake v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
