Search for: "Wales v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
This issue includes a special dedication to the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Paul R. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
The legal precedent Joanne Turner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Insurance companies have historically favored New York law, perceiving it to be more insurer-friendly than other laws and recognizing that companies based in the United States likely would find application of the law of a jurisdiction in the United States more acceptable and familiar than the law of a country outside of the country. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Insurance companies have historically favored New York law, perceiving it to be more insurer-friendly than other laws and recognizing that companies based in the United States likely would find application of the law of a jurisdiction in the United States more acceptable and familiar than the law of a country outside of the country. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful – Suneet Sharma. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
Nigeria It is reported that the High Court has awarded Kingsley Kuku damages of N10 million against the Abuja Inquirer United States President Trump is seeking to have a defamation claim against him dismissed, arguing that the statement that women accusing him of sexual misconduct were “liars” is simply an expression of opinion. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
Conservative MP, Bob Seely has put forward a private member’s bill to enable courts in England and Wales to penalize wealthy individuals who use vexatious litigation to silence critics in what are known as SLAPPs. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
United States Stanford&rsq [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
On the retention of DNA and other biometric evidence (S & Marper v UK): “once the Protection of Freedoms Act had come into force in England and Wales, the police would begin removing the profiles of un-convicted people from the National DNA Database. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
On the same day there will be the hearing of an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
A New South Wales Supreme court judge ruled that Australian publishers are liable for defamatory comments on their Facebook sites. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
Although the European Court of Human Rights has held that the rule does not in itself violate Article 10 (Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 1 and 2) v United Kingdom (Apps Nos 3002/03 and 23676/03) [2009] EMLR 254), it is clear that it can have an onerous impact upon newspapers and other online publishers. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
The proposed draft updates references to subsequent legislation, in particular the Data Protection Act 2018 and the judgement in Bridges v South Wales Police. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
C2 did not have a good arguable case on serious financial loss and C1 did not have a good arguable case that England and Wales was his centre of interest. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
Maybe the End of Times, for False Marking Suits Under the America Invents Act, "Only the United States may sue for statutory damages. [read post]
