Search for: "Wallace v. Wallace"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 7:42 am
Wallace and argued that the current exception was vague, but he relied on it. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:12 pm
If Wallace didn’t run, then a Catholic or a woman would expand his electoral appeal. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Wood v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Here are some recent developments on the sexual orientation front: In June 2013, in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:04 am
In Melendres v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:12 pm
Wallace, Indiana University Maurer School of Law Class of 2016April 8, 2015While the Supreme Court has decided to remain silent on the matter, courts differ on whether to extend Batson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Wallace Tashima at the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
The case is Heineman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:44 am
“Well, if the judge is comparing you to the Black Knight from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, now’s probably a good time” [Kevin Underhill, Lowering the Bar, on the Montana case of Wallace v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
, INS v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 2:05 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 2:05 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
" Unfortunately, last June, in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
Wayman v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:12 am
Wallace (1939) validated a delegation to a private actor, and so the usual “intelligible principle” test applies. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:41 am
Currin v. [read post]
