Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2018, 11:36 am
This issue was considered recently by the Ontario Superior Court in McLeod v 1274458 Ontario Inc.[1] The employee, McLeod, was 40 years old, earned $40,000 a year, and had been employed for 18 years as a mover. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:57 am
Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration with the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division (“Court”). [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
The Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Superior Court, supra; Mark A. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
(Per the Court, those cases are: (1) County of Inyo v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Superior Court of Stanislaus County (March 4, 2010) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (F057690) the Fifth Appellate District muddied the waters some more. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:31 pm
Supreme Court Decisions EMAK Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:29 am
Navy Seals 1-26 v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:01 am
They cite an adoption standing case decided in 2017 by the Superior Court, KW v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
§ 1369(b)(1)(F), the portion of the Clean Water Act’s judicial review provision that requires that agency actions “in issuing or denying any permit” under Section 1342 be reviewed by the court of appeals, to decide petitions to review the waters-of-the-United-States rule, even though the rule does not “issu[e] or den[y] any permit” but instead defines the waters that fall within Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
Facebook (California Superior Court). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
County of Madera); and appropriate remedies in circumstances in which the court finds CEQA error (Land Value 77, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
SRVA petitioned for a writ of mandate, which was denied by the Inyo County Superior Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
SRVA petitioned for a writ of mandate, which was denied by the Inyo County Superior Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 7:24 pm
The Superior Court agreed. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
The Court discussed their decisions in Ruby Drilling Co., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
The Court discussed their decisions in Ruby Drilling Co., Inc. v. [read post]
