Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 541 - 560 of 2,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am by Peter Mahler
Court Grants Dissolution Petition Against Majority Shareholder Who Transferred Manhattan Restaurant’s Assets to His Separate Company for No Consideration Kocak v Dargin, 2020 NY Slip Op 33121(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 23, 2020]. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 12:45 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Without the taking of the impressions - which takes place on the patient - the laboratory method cannot be performed.2.6 Consequently, the claimed method includes a surgical step and is therefore excluded from patentability under Article 53(c) EPC.Sachverhalt und Anträge(...)V. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Biedermann2017 IL App (2d) 151174-U This division of assets into the simple categories of 1) husband’s, 2) wife’s. 3) the marriage’s is very simple if the parties get divorced just a few days or months after the wedding date. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 5:33 am by Sean Quirk
” In other words, O’Brien is saying that Taiwan needs to mirror China’s strategy that constrains the deployment of opposing forces into a given theater and reduces their freedom of maneuver. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the hard lesson learned by the 49% LLC member in Lard-PT, LLC v Seokoh, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51208(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 20, 2020], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok denied the 49% member’s summary judgment motion based on findings that put the 51% member on a winning path. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm by Sara Chimene-Weiss, Helen White
By the logic of the Supreme Court’s reigning Second Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
Every time I hear the words “We the People,” I think of the man’s quiet dignity. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
  (It's true that the victim testified that she didn't learn about the U-visa program until after her initial testimony at the preliminary hearing, which is indeed a huge problem with the defense, but a jury need not take her word for that fact -- just as they need not necessarily take her word about the underlying domestic violence.)Similarly, the Court of Appeal notes that there was indeed a difference in the testimony that she gave in the… [read post]