Search for: "v. JONES" Results 541 - 560 of 9,903
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am by CMS
In this post, Henry Powell (Associate) and Antoni Hajdon (Of Counsel) in the Real Estate Disputes team at CMS, comment on the case of Barton & Ors v Morris & Anor in place of Gwyn Jones (deceased) [2023] UKSC 3 – handed down on 25 January 2023. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:56 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Jones, 543 NE 2d 119 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1989 However, there is subsequent case authority that says courts should NOT order a property division in lieu of maintenance. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am by Jeff Welty
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
(There are some exceptions — most notably Jones Day, which gained notoriety for its work on behalf of Trump.) [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
He was joined by Reagan-appointee Judge Edith Jones and Judge James Ho, another Trump appointee who also wrote a concurrence. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:08 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer https://www.rrbdlaw.com/6876/securities-industry-commentator/ Lira v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Chris Dreyer
@AprilJonesLaw April Jones built one of Colorado’s most successful family law firms and now manages the firm and its lawyers. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Leggatt, with whom Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones agree, gave the majority judgment. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Leading Case Law The Court noted that while Doeblin cited to cases like Jones v Voskresenskaya (125 AD3d 532 [1st Dept 2015]), and Pokoik v Pokoik (115 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2014]), for the general “proposition that members of an LLC may owe a fiduciary duty to the LLC and to other members,” Doeblin lacked any case law support for the specific proposition that non-managing members owe fiduciary duties. [read post]