Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 32,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
On its examination of the merits, the Court found that there was a violation of R’s Article 1 Protocol 1 rights. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
On its examination of the merits, the Court found that there was a violation of R’s Article 1 Protocol 1 rights. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
On its examination of the merits, the Court found that there was a violation of R’s Article 1 Protocol 1 rights. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
July 8, 2011), is whether the adoption of the UPA fundamentally altered the relationship between the partners of a partnership, and whether precedent going back to the early 20th Century is still good law. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
Also, under 8 CFR 204.5(e): “Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:14 am
Also, under 8 CFR 204.5(e): “Retention of section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) priority date. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:22 am
If the court makes a finding under subdivision (1), (2), (4), or (7), the court shall also consider subdivisions (3), (5), (6), (8), and (9) in determining the amount of security, bond, or other guarantee. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:10 am
On the topic of equity award policies, the July-August 2024 issue of The Corporate Executive notes: These new disclosure requirements create an opportunity for a company to revisit its equity award policy, or adopt a new equity award policy if it does not have one. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:38 am
Wright’s PSR recommended a base level offense of 9 plus an 8-level enhancement for a total offense level of 17.Wright objected to the 8 level enhancement, as § 2B5.1(b)(1) bases the enhancement on the "face value of the counterfeit items. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:52 am
The prior rule stated that malfunctioning equipment “does not” qualify as a technical failure. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
” If the work rule does not explicitly restrict protected activities, it nonetheless will violate Section 8(a)(1) if “(1) employees would reasonably construe the language to prohibit Section 7 activity; (2) the rule was promulgated in response to union activity; or (3) the rule has been applied to restrict the exercise of Section 7 rights. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
Under Pennsylvania law as described in Foster, however, the employee would be owed an overtime premium of $120 ($8/hour x 1½ x 10 hours), for a total of $520. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:17 am
What Dylan song does the headline refer to? [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 2:44 am
Pro. 95-535 at p7-8 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
As you may know, when determining the size of an entity-owned 8(a) company, SBA does not consider other entities with common ownership to be affiliates. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
” While the list is by no means exhaustive, it does provide some hot topics for organizations to consider in 2017. 1. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
April 8, 2014). [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:39 am
This does not have to be the case. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
” While the list is by no means exhaustive, it does provide some hot topics for organizations to consider in 2017. 1. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Readers may note that the statute does not set any limits on the types of reasons that may be found in s.143E notices or s.143F review decisions. [read post]
