Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 7,622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi & Anor v Clarke [2011] EWCA Civ 937 (29… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
Todd Smith has multiple reasons to celebrate recently – his firm reached a benchmark anniversary and he was elected chair of the Austin Bar Appellate Section. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
(Afro-IP) Elections, patents and injunctive relief in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Switzerland Virgin considers move to Switzerland for its IP licensing business (IP finance) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Patent valid, in part, not infringed: ConvaTec v Smith & Nephew (IPKat) (PatLit) UK Supreme Court: Star Wars helmets did not infringe copyright because they are not art: Lucasfilm v Ainsworth (Out-Law) (Art and Artiface) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Class 99) (IP finance) (IP Whiteboard)… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
Not only do few of the applicable statutes provide for a private right of action, but even fewer allow the winner to receive attorneys’ fees from the loser. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:BREAKING NEWS -GROSSBARD - LAESER - PLOSS - SMITH - ZENOBI -REGIONAL COUNSEL - 3RD DCA APPLICANTS .......What a crowd of applicants! [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:38 am
The drivers are now asking a federal court to approve a $3.75 million dollar settlement in the case, that is entitled Smith v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
Smith held that neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the American with Disabilities Act is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:45 am
Smith (which I think was wrongly decided) said that a variety of religious exemptions from neutral and generally applicable laws were not constitutionally required. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:35 am
., R (on the application of) v The Parking Adjudicator [2011] EWCA Civ 905 (27 July 2011) Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 898 (27 July 2011) Telford Trustee No.1 Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Telford and Wrekin Council [2011] EWCA Civ 896 (27 July 2011) Condliff, R (on the application of) v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 910 (27 July 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Windsor v… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
‘746 was a PCT application published about a year before the priority date of the patent in suit. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
Ct. 2368, 2377 (2011), which made the point that even identically-phrased enactments (rules in Smith, but equally applicable to the UCC or a Restatement section) can be interpreted differently in different jurisdictions, thus creating “different standards. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:37 am
Smith held that neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the American with Disabilities Act is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
GA, Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court cited them with approval in Wal-Mart and Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:32 pm
Smith Jr., executive director of D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:39 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:13 am
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:10 am
Tomorrow’s post will discuss the potential impact of the mixing of the duty of candor and good faith with that of the duty of disclosure relative to reexamination practices and the proposed post grant proceedings of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
