Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 5581 - 5600 of 8,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular  the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
 The trial court initially stated that this latter question was outside of its jurisdiction but seems to have reversed course. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:43 am by Gregory Eisenreich
" Schwab's insertion of this waiver language followed the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:08 am by Rosalind English
But Mr Moore’s somewhat recondite tussle with the waterways authority contains within it some elements of a great constitutional battle. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:04 am
Two days ago, a federal judge ruled DOMA unconstitutional in Golinski v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:27 am by Rick
And in “domestic violence” cases, there is a high percentage of “I’m-going-to-fuck-you-because-you’re-divorcing-me-and-it-will-help-me-in-my-custody-battle” allegations. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by admin
Last month, a federal district judge sitting in Colorado ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]