Search for: "Davis v. Davis" Results 5581 - 5600 of 8,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am by Richard D. Friedman
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court properly assessed him points for his history of alcohol and drug abuse based upon the admissions contained in the presentence report as held in People v Williams, People v Perser, People v Davis and People v Masters. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm by Jon Sands
The jury instruction was thus proper under Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Karlan[1]  On the eve of the Supreme Court’s hearing Davis v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
 The UCL debate on the UK Supreme Court decision Actavis v Eli Lilly ("Equivalents: K = Na. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am by JB
The Court allowed a similar arrangement in Davis v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Davis Wright Tremaine Blog-Proud No problem finding the blogs here. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
Davis, 17-6883 Issue: Whether — when the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am by Eric
July 17, 2012) [Eric's Note: Sam Bayard is an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in New York. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bruen) and one repudiating abortion rights (Dobbs v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  When the Court turned to the second case, Virginia v. [read post]