Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 12,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2012, 11:27 am
This would be a high Category 1 hurricane. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:37 pm
How does this judgment fit with other decisions in this area? [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm
On October 27, 2022, before the market opened. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
The draft legislation will now go the Legal Committee of the Bundesrat and could be voted on by the Bundesrat in December (UPDATE 27/11: according to the UPC Preparatory Committee this is expected to take place on 18 December 2020). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:03 pm
This post will discuss what happens if an UFTA violation does take place. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:24 am
Lemley, Does Public Use Mean the Same Thing It Did Last Year? [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 3:02 pm
Between 10/1/09 and 10/01/10, Facebook sent nearly 8500 visitors to the Law School website (this does not include the number that it sent to the Faculty Blog [just over 350] or the Becker-Posner Blog [just over 4,000]). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
TTAB Sustains 2(d) "TELMEX" Opposition, Finding Applicant Acted in Really Bad FaithPrecedential No. 27: Finding Computer Software and Services Related, TTAB Affirms 2(d) "ACTIVECARE" RefusalSection 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness:TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of "ROUGE TOMATE" for Fruit and Vegetable JuicesTTAB Reverses Refusal of "CORPORATE FUEL" For Business Advisory Services, Finding Disclaimer of… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
Georges] Avenue (Route 27), Linden, Union County, NJ. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:48 am
The GAO cited a prior decision–G2G, LLC, B-416502, Sept. 27, 2018–which took issue with a default clause’s significant departure from the rights and obligations specifically set forth in FAR provision 52.228-1(e). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
1997, c. 36. [8] Bill S-211 at ss. 26 and 27. [9] CBC, “Canada terminates $222M PPE contract following forced labour probe” (January 18, 2022). [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
Unfashionable as it may appear, I consider that there is much to be said in this area for asking a judge to rule on whether the case is capable of passing the s.1 test, or on the other hand whether the defendant has any real prospect of establishing that it does not. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
July 1, 2014).Issues[1] AbbVie argues that Centocor’s [(Jannsen's)] invalidity defenses as to [U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm
A scanned copy of the RTI application and the response received from NCRB is at Annexure -1. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:54 am
Corporation Tax Return, lines 11-27 lists expenses which could directly benefit a di [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
The meaning of “treatment” Although s 1 of the Act does not use the word “treatment”, it is clear that the treatment to which s 4 refers is the termination of pregnancy under s 1. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1,… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am
The patient was previously diagnosed by a physician as 26 having a debilitating medical condition; 27 (2)? [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
”In its response dated April 27, 2007, the patent proprietor contested that the methods according to D1, D2 and D3 would necessarily lead to a product according to the opposed patent. [read post]
