Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 5581 - 5600 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by LawDiva
Imerman where the English Court of Appeal held that documents obtained by one party by subterfuge would not be admitted as evidence in court. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm by Veronika Gaertner
” – the English abstract reads as follows: Same-sex marriages are on the rise if seen from a comparative perspective. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm
Before the Supreme Court's 6-3 judgment in Skinner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm by Michael Scutt
However, English law does not allow litigants to bring claims in multiple fora. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am by Graeme Hall
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:00 am by Adam Wagner
Rosalind English has already posted on the ruling, which related to a Scottish murder appeal. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:04 am by David Hart QC
” This principle was then fleshed out in Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321 : …the courts and Parliament are both astute to recognise their respective constitutional roles. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:30 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, John DiFrancesco and DSS Partnership d/b/a DS & S Farms v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:20 am
  The attorney was charged with obstruction and making false statements related to a Food and Drug Administration investigation into drug promotions (United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:14 am by Lisa McElroy
The same kind of statutory interpretation issue arose in two of the other cases decided this week,  United States v. [read post]