Search for: "Florida v. United States"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 6,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
"In making the decision [whether to seal], the court should consider less restrictive 'alternatives to sealing [that] provide an adequate record for review' and should 'state the reasons for its decision [with] specific findings.'" United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 4:01 pm
Attorneys’ offices, and the Department of Justice, along with child support agencies across the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:01 pm
United States, 442 F.3d 1345 (Fed. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 6:03 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm
The takeaway for the American electorate is that the future of the United States, every four years, can be determined by a handful of voters in a couple of states. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 5:26 am
: Microsoft v i4i (IPKat) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Copyright When pirates become copyright cash cows (TorrentFreak) Can copyright save the newspaper industry? [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
United States Law.com had a piece “Devin Nunes’ Defamation Case Against CNN Transferred to Manhattan Federal Court”. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
A public outcry erupted over this mass shooting and the NRA’s central role in promoting weapons proliferation in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
The decision in State v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm
If you are inclined to voice your concerns to the Court, please write to her at the following address: Re: United States of America v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Trademark registration in China (China Law Blog) Another ridiculous IPR protection awareness event (China Hearsay) Colombia Colombia’s Senate approves accession to Madrid Protocol in second reading (Managing IP) Europe EU member states sign agreement in principle on establishing single EU patent (Managing IP) (IAM) (Blog@IPJUR.com) (IPKat) Lisbon treaty updates EU; new commissioners named (IP Watch) Hague Agreement: you win some, you lose some –… [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 11:01 am
Unless the United States can convince a partner nation that their information can be adequately protected, they may be dissuaded from sharing it, thus placing the United States and its citizens at increased risk. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
” MLive covered the event and posted a short video of Justice Ginsburg discussing the Court’s 1996 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm
” The case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
The abstract reads: In Schenck v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
Here is the abstract: In Schenck v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe. [read post]
