Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 5581 - 5600 of 7,665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2010, 4:13 pm by Jeralyn
Senator for Colorado, I'm sure he'll be much better than his Republican opponent and I'll vote for him. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm by Dan Markel
, since those are individual papers; I'm looking for remarks people wrote up for panels around a particular shared theme.The Future of the Media in an Internet Age This panel focuses on the future of the media in light of a host of new and emerging technologies, including the Internet, Twitter, Flicker, blogs, and cable and satellite communications. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:42 am by Michael Scutt
Personally, I’m not convinced by this mainly because it is the government’s estimate and they’re probably just trying to assuage employers. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:31 am by Mandelman
”  No, Benjamin… we think YOU’RE A DOUBLE DIP. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court Utah: Defendant’s inadequate data retention policies, loss of source code for patented software did not warrant terminating sanctions for spoliation: Phillip M. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Bexis
When the Levine, Riegel, and Kent cases were briefed in the United States Supreme Court, we provided our readers with “users’ guides”/”guided tours” that summarized the defense side arguments and pointed out whatever we thought was interesting.Today we’re continuing that tradition with the Bruesewitz (sooner or later we’ll memorize how to spell that) v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:50 am by SHG
  Nonetheless, I'm giving it another try. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
Monday's post on the subject has sparked off quite a bit of debate, so I'm going to write an editorial for the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (JIPLP) on this very point. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:23 am by Mandelman
They turned to Bruce Marks’ traveling tent show of an non-profit organization, NACA, for help. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:32 am by David Lat
The sale price: a cool $1.725 million (marked down from an original $1.99 million). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
  On this ground, B&M asks the court to re-write the contract so as to remove the $3.5 million payment… B&M is a sophisticated commercial party that was represented by lawyers. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:24 am
So how could the mark “NEW YORK NEW YORK” have been distinctive at the time of the Domain Name was registered if the only basis for NY-NY’s own claim for registration on the Principal Register is NY-NY’s claim of acquire distinctiveness which it could not have achieved until it began using the mark in commerce in January 1997? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Vol. 2, No. 22, August 2, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]