Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 5581 - 5600
of 13,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2023, 8:31 am
E.g., the mobile site temporarily failed to include disclosures required by the injunction because of “a technical error”—“one errant line of code”—but “the webpage in question was updated ... [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:02 pm
The DMA identifies core platform services as gatekeepers when they have a significant impact on the EU internal market (e.g. through earnings), have a strong intermediation position (e.g. through their number of users), and which show an entrenched and durable position (number of years in business). [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:48 pm
A whopping 9% of the old USNWR measured “direct” expenditures (e.g., not scholarships). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:05 am
Circuit and the Eleventh (e.g., United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Re-introducing a highly reflecting metal layer which this time must be non-magnetic in order to solve the problem of decoupling magnetic and optical properties thus constitutes an exact reversal of the original teaching of D8, which the skilled person would not undertake without good reason or the expectation of substantial advantages, for which there is no evidence. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:06 pm
And if they do, just keep doing what you’re doing. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
In March 2016, the Human Rights Council adopted a landmark Resolution (res 31/ 32) which requires States to ensure the rights and safety of human rights defenders working towards the realization of economic, social and cultural rights. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:50 am
Although the ITC ruled that several claims were invalid for lacking written description (e.g., claim 5), Eko defaulted with respect to claims 8 and 19 and the ITC issued an exclusion order with respect to those claims. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
Last month, the attorneys general for eleven different states petitioned the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
We’re up to half a million applications a year. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
Turn into CLS: they’re just a legal fiction. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
E.g., Wood v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
There are more participants that will join if they’re less offended/excluded. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:17 pm
See, e.g., In re Simonini, 69 Fed. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:22 am
Demographic data were obtained from OMS files, while incidents of re-offending were taken from CPIC information. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
See, e.g., In Re Hill, 777 F.3d 1214 (11th Cir. 2015)(denying permission to file a successive habeas petition in order to re-litigate a previously rejected mental retardation claim). [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
See Stone Barn, 398 B.R. at 367 (collecting cases); but see, e.g., In re Baby N' Kids, 2007 WL 1218768 (E.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
We’re not in that world any more. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
See, e.g., Assoc. of Civilian Technicians v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:44 am
(If you're a developer and you suspect that you've seen this license before, you might have. [read post]
