Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 5581 - 5600 of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2013, 8:02 am by Steven Boranian
Instructions and warnings that accompany implanted medical devices present complex issues, and they are directed to medical professionals, not lay jurors. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 1:29 pm by Ilya Somin
Ignorance and bias on the part of lay jurors can lead to serious errors in such situations. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm
” The victims also point to the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Mallory v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:01 am by Graham Smith
 Since the government will at some point lay draft regulations before Parliament, this is a good point at which to review the currently circulating draft regulations (which may yet change) and take a stab at predicting their practical consequences. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
These are provided by the presence of three persons, already referred to in the context of Articles III and V of the Convention, that is to say, the authorised person and the two witnesses. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:26 am
In the absence of any provision which explicitly lays down the correct code of conduct for EU judges, which would be the preferable model among those adopted in Member States? [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:20 pm by Shahid Buttar
Acting both to defend the rights of journalists and these broader principles, EFF filed our amicus brief, and also supported an online petition launched by the International Documentary Association calling on the Justice Department to intervene to restrain local police departments from arresting, detaining, or harassing either professional or lay journalists. 5) Secret International Trade Agreements Since at least 1995, when the World Trade Organization adopted its Agreement on… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 12:11 am by Florian Mueller
I'm so grateful for the great support I've received from Google that I won't comment publicly on Oracle v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 11:27 am by Jon Roland
US v Hudson 1812 correctly decided that the Constitution did not authorize Congress to define and punish common law crimes. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:22 pm
The answer is as much about policy as it is law, but the courts should be laying down clear principles and guidance such that we know for ourselves the answer to that question. [read post]
7 Sep 2024, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
The Opinion is adamant that neither Article 17 of the Design Directive nor Article 96(2) of the Design Regulation question that this possibility is precluded:Those provisions therefore lay down not a principle of general scope governing the protection of works of applied art in EU copyright law, but a rule for overlapping protection regimes confined to the substantive scope of the acts concerned, namely the subject matter protected as designs under those acts.The InfoSoc Directive preempts… [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
  Examples of both such highs and such lows reside in the recent case of Ezeb v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]