Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 5581 - 5600 of 88,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Eugene Volokh] When Couple Is Divorcing, What Should Happen to Their Fertilized Pre-Embryos?
28 Jun 2023, 3:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Jocelyn P. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Carbon Neutrality Suit Against Delta Airlines Signals the Arrival Time of “Greenwashing” Litigation
28 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm by Byron J. McLain and Cole K. Waldhauser
The complaint, filed in Mayanna Berrin v. [read post]
Consumer Class Defense Counsel - https://www.foley.com/en/insights/blogs/consumer-class-defense-counsel
[Ilya Somin] Qualified Immunity Meets the Takings Clause
28 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by Ilya Somin
See Viceroy v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Ninth Circuit: Additional Information on Back of Packaging can Defeat Deceptive Labelling Claim
28 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by Jaikaran Singh and Kelsey Finn
  In McGinity, the plaintiff, on behalf of a putative consumer class, brought state law consumer protection claims against Procter & Gamble (P&G) for violations under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). [read post]
Consumer Class Defense Counsel - https://www.foley.com/en/insights/blogs/consumer-class-defense-counsel
[Stephen E. Sachs] "Dormant Commerce" and Corporate Powers
28 Jun 2023, 2:56 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
Yesterday the Court reversed in Mallory v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Shifting paradigms in platform regulation – Graham Smith
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm by INFORRM
Proactive obligations of this kind raise serious questions about a state’s compliance with human rights law, due to the high risk that in their efforts to determine whether user content is legal or illegal, platforms will end up taking down users’ legitimate speech at scale. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Indian Law Bulletins Updated 6/28/2023
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm by NARF
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
National Indian Law Library -- News - http://nilllibrary.blogspot.com/
On Brackeen and the Value of Careful History: A Response to Lorianne Updike Toler
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This legal conclusion leads to other legal conclusions. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Texas HHSC-OIG is Ramping-Up its Investigations of Medicaid Pediatric Telemedicine Claims
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am by Robert Liles
The MFCU works closely with Federal and State law enforcement agencies, and it has the power to arrest, prosecute, and bring legal action against individuals or organizations engaged in Medicaid fraud. [read post]
Liles Parker PLLC Blog - http://www.lilesparker.com
Calabritto, "Murder and Madness on Trial: A Tale of True Crime from Early Modern Bologna"
28 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
”—Thomas V. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Legal malpractice claim required expert proof from plaintiff.
28 Jun 2023, 5:59 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
In Parks v. [read post]
Day on Torts - http://www.dayontorts.com/
Pocket Mortgages and Legal Malpractice
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants, citing United States v Bertie Ambulance Serv. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Renders Personal Jurisdiction Decision
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
Co. v. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
Islamic Marriage Contract Enforceable in Civil Court
28 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In Alulddin v. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Plaintiff’s Third-Party Observers May Attend Defense Medical Examinations [DME]
28 Jun 2023, 1:17 am by Jon L. Gelman
”  Attendance of a legal representative ensures that the examination is conducted fairly and addresses any concerns about the process.ADJUSTING THE POWER BALANCEAs Justice Wainer-Apter stated, "...a DME reflects a profound power imbalance between the plaintiff and a medical professional with long experience in the examination of patients and participation in court proceedings. [read post]
Workers' Compensation - http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/
SEC Commissioner Speaks on Shareholder Proposals, Proxy Statements, and Rule 14a-8
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/
While I Was Out, All of the Sanctions Happened
27 Jun 2023, 3:17 pm by Stacie Rosenzweig
These sanctions included attorney fees, continuing legal education classes, and disciplinary referrals to the attorneys’ respective state agencies. [read post]
Ethicking.com - http://www.ethicking.com
Second District Affirms Judgment Upholding City of Pomona’s Commercial Cannabis Permit Program Overlay District As CEQA-Exempt Under Statutory Exemption Provided In Guidelines Section 15183 For Projects Consistent With Development Density Established By Existing Zoning, General Plan, Or Community Plan for Which EIR Was Certified; Holds Substantial Evidence Standard of Review Applies To Lead Agency’s Finding of Exemption
27 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Gregory Lucas v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Jones v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
US Supreme Court rejects North Carolina’s ‘independent legislature’ theory
27 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm by Rebekah Yeager-Malkin | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
Reno and Cooper v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/