Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 5581 - 5599
of 5,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2006, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court addressed the issue in 1986, in the case of Ford v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Members Schaumber and Walsh rejected the Respondent's contention that the complaint is time-barred by Section 10(b). [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 7:40 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Tony V. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
The Fall/Winter 2006 issue of Competition, the journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, recently arrived in the mail. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
" Mullane v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
Other times, his captors would bang the walls and cell bars creating loud startling noises. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 6:08 am
§ 1447(d) bars appellate review of district court's order unless CAFA applies, appeal is dismissed.Waugh v. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
The solution was suggested to me by the State's brief and its reliance on Slack v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 9:49 am
A New Jersey state court in a case called Dendrite Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:23 pm
For example, forum states may have a lower bar for registration requirements than foreign states; thus, out of state conduct that may be deemed relatively benign in the foreign state may prompt severe consequences once the migrant offender moves to the forum state. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 8:22 am
Today (August 2, 2006), a lawyer asked on the Family Law Listserv a question that may be of substantial interest to some Michigan parents and lawyers in light of the Michigan supreme court's decision three days ago in Barnes v Jeudevine. [read post]
12 May 2006, 5:46 am
This omission is especially glaring in light of the recent opinion letters about structured settleme [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
Brokers Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2006, 1:14 am
In Davani v. [read post]
23 Dec 2004, 12:01 pm
On one track, state and federal courts will reverse and revise Manson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2004, 11:07 am
We posted on Elwood v. [read post]
