Search for: "MATTER OF T H" Results 5581 - 5600 of 6,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
But the answer may also depend on the forum state's law on the matter of how a time-barred debt can be revived, and the limitations clock restarted. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
"Now, Sasha (not her real name) is simply wrong, as a matter of law; her pitchfork won't penetrate the automatic stay. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:34 pm
Tags: institute of medicine, john a burns school of medicine, patrick h deleon, uh-manoa MEDIA RELEASE The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has announced the selection of Patrick H. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
” Such an abstract interest is rarely a matter of importance to a court adjudicating a case. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
The US Supreme Court now held that the amount was excessive as a matter of maritime common law and reduced the award of $2.5 billion punitive damages to $500 million, invoking a 1:1 maximum limit (in maritime cases) of punitive damages to compensatory damages (here, $507 million).Justice Souter, speaking for the court, wrote what appears to be an intentionally detailed, historically-tracing and forward-looking opinion on the legal aspects of punitive damages, essentially telling us that… [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:14 am by Matthias Weller
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:22 am by Matthias Weller
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Frankly, I had repressed that part of my background, so deeply is it now embedded in my approach to law—and pedagogy—that I almost wouldn’t dream of asking a student to offer a Dworkinian “right answer” to a complex legal question. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  The Absurdity of the "We Don't Want to Affirmatively Facilitate Abortions" Argument.That same evening, DOJ sought a stay of the injunction as to Roe (but not as to Poe) in both the court of appeals and the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:40 am by David Kris
The whistleblower learns from U.S. officials that the Ukrainians have come to understand—presumably from Giuliani and/or his associates, although the whistleblower doesn’t know for sure—that if they want a telephone call between their president and President Trump, they need to “play ball” on the allegations against Biden et al. [read post]
Procedural History On March 27, 2018, the attorney general and the director of the Office of National Intelligence (DNI) submitted 702 authorization certifications (2018 certifications) and their accompanying targeting, minimization and querying procedures to the FISC for approval, as required by Section 702(h). [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 10:21 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
After the Cuban air force struck down an airplane belonging to Brothers to the Rescue, the U.S. released the long-held (and disputed) AT&T long distance escrowed funds as compensation for damages to a group of plaintiffs who had filed lawsuits in the U.S. arising from this incident. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Furthermore, “[h]ad Congress wanted to limit “induce” to actions contemplated by two separate parties, it could easily have done so by assigning liability only where one party actively induced another “to combine the [p]atented components. [read post]