Search for: "Mark Case" Results 5581 - 5600 of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 3:49 am by Melanie Perez
” She tells WWD, “The Third Street Flea Market case illustrates Coach’s commitment to enforcing its intellectual property rights. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:48 am by admin
  The TTAB in the Apple case wrote that the greater the degree of descriptiveness that a term has, the heavier the burden the applicant has to prove that the mark has attained secondary meaning. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:03 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The decreased caseload marks a dramatic change in approach for the primary DOJ division devoted to investigating accusations of racial, ethnic, and other forms of bias. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 11:58 am by Peter J. Louie, Esq.
DISCLAIMER – EACH CASE IS UNIQUE AND CASE RESULTS DEPEND ON YOUR INDIVIDUAL SITUATION. [read post]
25 May 2022, 11:27 am by KJK
” Listen to the full radio broadcast here, with Samir’s conversation beginning around the 113:30 mark. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:30 am by Evan Anderson
"  The BIG CAT Case is illustrative of the more favorable and broad application of the Likelihood of Confusion analysis that is employed when a Board recognized famous trademark is that mark which is allegedly being infringed upon by the Applicant's Mark.The fame of the BIG CAT Mark resulted in a more strong and conclusive determination that the channels of trade within which the respective marks in the Opposition were sufficiently similar. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:46 am
Applicant did not submit copies of the COLAs, but in any case a COLA is evidence only that the label was approved by the TTB. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:37 am
And, of course:Although administrative consistency is a goal, these third-party registrations are not conclusive on the question of registrability of Applicant’s designation inasmuch as each case must stand on its own merits.The Board therefore affirmed the refusals to register.Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog note: How about SCHOOLFURNITUREIVLESS [note the Roman numeral]? [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:03 am
Applicant submitted no evidence or testimony, leaving it up to opposer to prove its case. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:59 am
"Thus, while Registrant could offer its products to industries requiring material lifting equipment, it is unlikely that the purchasers in those industries will confuse its mark with Applicant’s CROSBY-formative mark.Therefore the third and fourth du Pont factors favor applicant.Conclusion: Considering the relevant factors, the Board found confusion unlikely and it reversed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Sometimes the addition of a… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 2:32 am
There was no evidence that any of those marks were in use, and in any case the Board is not bound by prior decisions of examining attorneys in allowing marks to register. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 4:03 am
The Board, however, decided the case without relying on the admissions. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:58 am by John L. Welch
The Board observed that this is not a case where the addition of punctuation does not change the meaning of a word or term. [read post]
18 May 2017, 3:28 am
In re USA Warriors Ice Hockey Program, Inc., Serial No. 86489116 (May 16, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Bergsman).Du Pont 13: Applicant argued that this case is analogous to Strategic Partners [TTABlogged here], where the Board reversed a Section 2(d) refusal based on applicant's ownership of a substantially similar mark that had co-existed with the cited registered mark for more than five years. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 3:51 am
The Board was unimpressed, observing once again that each case must be decided on its own record.Finally, True Value argued that its ownership of a prior registration for the mark MASTER RANCHER for gloves should provide a basis for registration. [read post]
Case date: 19 May 2021 Case number: No. 20-30233 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]