Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 22,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
A better idea is adopting legislation expressly authorizing pre-death will contests. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:05 am
The ruling in the Semenya case, though, is expected to prompt the I.O.C. to recommend that all Olympic sports adopt the more restrictive cutoff of five nanomoles per liter.This is a complicated problem. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:45 am
“As good as new,” is Ninth’s new rule. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:46 am
Case C-500/14 Ford Motor Company is a reference made by the Tribunale ordinario di Torino, Italy, for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on a matter that has been raised before the Italian courts on a number of occasions in recent years -- the unauthorised manufacture of "spare part" wheel trims bearing the trade marks of the original manufacturer in order to enable the purchaser to make sure that his purchase matches the appearance… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:33 am
No matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 12:43 pm
Probably both, but it doesn’t really matter since it is now the law of the land (subject to a delayed effective date). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:13 am
My guess is the majority did not adopt that view, which is why it decided this case on the narrower grounds relating to the religious bias expressed by the Human Rights Commission. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
The defendants asked the court to rehear the matter en banc, but the court denied that request and the panel amended its October 2014 opinion. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Decision of the CIC:The CIC took into consideration the relevant provisions under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules (Article 14), the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Sections 70, 75 & 81), the (Delhi) Mediation & Conciliation Rules, 2004 (Rules 20 and 21) and the decisions of the Supreme Court in Haresh Dayaram Thakur v Maharashtra AIR 2000 SC 2281 and Moti Ram v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
Adopted by the SEC under the mandate of the JOBS Act on March 25, so-called Regulation A+ raises the dollar limit for smaller offerings that are exempt from Securities Act registration. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 11:01 am
The decision to implement a democratic majority rule instead of a first come first served rule merely reflects a different choice of social interaction concerning the manner of decision taking. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
The court ruled in this fashion despite recognizing the Plaintiffs’ argument that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have never adopted the gist of the action doctrine in an insurance coverage dispute context. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 (now 2011) adopts this stance, and would render unenforceable all pre-dispute arbitration agreements in employment, consumer, franchise and civil rights matters. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 9:28 am
The sae patent was on the verge of coming to judgment against Apple in the spring of 2011, but a week before the ruling date the parties settled. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 10:26 am
The final ruling could be different from the SO. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
Not sure.It's also clear that Judge Robart's ruling becomes ever more influential. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:56 am
For example, both Mastercard and Visa have adopted rules implicating automatic renewals and require certain additional notifications to their cardholders. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
While Thomas' opinion is a far cry from an actual Supreme Court ruling that would over turn a 50+ year of robust political criticism in the United States, were the Court to adopt his views on this issue (and I doubt it ever will), it would change political dialogue in this country forever. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 5:21 am
Advisers are also explicitly required to adopt and implement policies and procedures to ensure that advisers vote clients' proxies in the clients' best interests. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
But the Texas Supreme Court ruled that any Dennis Canon trust was not expressly irrevocable, and so the withdrawal of the Diocese and its associated parishes from the Episcopal Church (USA) effectively revoked any such trust.Given that ruling, therefore, the outcome of Bishop Iker's summary judgment motion should be a foregone conclusion: there are simply no disputed facts requiring a trial. [read post]
