Search for: "Mays v. Paul"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 7,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2008, 9:10 pm
Ironically perhaps, marijuana was a theme of my appeal before Judge Ginsburg and the rest of this panel, through my argument about the soundness of federal trial judge Paul Friedman's 2004 ruling in ACLU v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Stewart M. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:47 pm
The style of the case is, State Farm Life Insurance Company and Lisa Martinez Paul v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:54 am
As Justice Scalia pointed out in his dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 2:38 pm
The case is LaRue v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:47 pm
I used the word Vapid on twitter last night and a fellow tweeter responded… I have another three words beginning with *V* which may usefully be employed to those who have watched the film Wall Street too many times…. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:29 pm
In the case of O’Brien v Governor of Limerick Prison [1997] 2 I.L.R.M. 349 it was held that where some of a sentence has been suspended, the remission period is calculated as per the period of time to be served. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:48 pm
Last Term, in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
But despite the legislative protection of the IFSA, foreign lenders have grown increasingly hesitant to make loans to U.S. museums in recent years, in large part because of the 2005 decision of the District Court for the District of Columbia in Malewicz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:20 pm
Paul Rashkind, Doug Berman, Gideon, the Legal Ethics Forum, and Mass Appeal have thought provoking analyzes of the opinion and where, like Apprendi, it may lead. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
Litigation reached the US Supreme Court which ruled on December 12, 2000in the 5–4 decision Bush v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:52 pm
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Jenny L. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
The 5-4 ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:27 am
– from Donna Ballman’s Screw You Guys, I'm Going Home Your boss may be ruining your marriage – from Life Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:51 am
One of the key tasks of the new appointees may be to restore a sense of cohesion to the area. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:53 am
Yesterday the Kat commented on Shanks v Unilever, a decision on the meaning of a somewhat obscure passage of statute law relating to the entitlement of an employee inventor to receive compensation where his invention has conferred an outstanding benefit on his employer. [read post]
8 May 2007, 1:33 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 1:21 pm
" said Paul Juettner, another patent attorney. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 1:23 pm
Based on the following passage in R. v. [read post]
