Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 51,352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 2:19 am
People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
In the recent case of Pena v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
In the recent case of Pena v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:26 pm
The San Antonio, Texas, case of Maverick Recording Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:04 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
The leading authority for many years has been Hunt v- Severs (1994). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
On January 24th, the Court of Appeals approved its November 2011 decision in People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
Today the California Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
In the case of Aleman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Daniels v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 11:03 am
So all I can manage is to point to two cases for Housing people’s attention, to which I will return when I have time. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:43 am
” J.S.A. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 10:11 pm
Simpson et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:54 am
In Dukes, the Court de-certified a class of more than one million people. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit, with a pretty tough panel (Chief Judge Edmondson, and Judges Tjoflat and Hill) affirmed a below guidelines sentence in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Case citation: NLRB v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:33 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, “each case is fact specific” (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of “the whole incident” (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 5:31 am
As described below, we conclude the people retained the power to annul a concurrence by the Governor and the voters exercised this retained power at the 2014 election by impliedly revoking the concurrence for the Madera site. [read post]
