Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 5581 - 5600 of 6,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: ‘Fraud’ Lawsuit Slams Plaid on Eve of Historic $5.3-Billion PaydayRIABiz – June 9, 2020 As Plaid nears the date when it banks a $5.3 billion dollar check from Visa, it may face a final hurdle from a class action alleging its value proposition depends on a “massive invasion” of the privacy of over 200 million bank and brokerage accounts. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
Note that there are precise and enforceable – and, as we shall see, useless – metric standards such as “126 CFU per 100 ml” (in a rolling geometric mean) of generic E. coli. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
A Short and Poignant Video on the True Meaning of Memorial Day Rolling Thunder roars into Washington for the 20th time. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Default status means what it sounds like: Google is pre-loaded and ready to roll “out of the box. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
His Honour Judge Bellamy’s criticism at paragraph 193 of L (A Child: Media Reporting), Re [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) of The Daily Telegraph’s Christopher Booker’s reporting of the case as “unbalanced, inaccurate and just plain wrong”, a criticism supported by Sir Nicholas Wall in X, Y, and Z & Anor v A Local Authority[2011] EWHC 1157 (Fam) at paragraph 102. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
No. 09–0724 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and EMC INSURANCE COMPANIES v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
In the Rolls Royce case, for example, Rolls Royce didn't suffer harm from being used as a symbol of lu [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:30 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
” The Court found Kenneth’s expert’s rent roll projections to be “inflated and speculative” which were “overstated amounts listed in the RENT column on the rent rolls that he admitted were NOT the amounts the properties actually collected or even billed. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court held that “...to the extent that certain dicta in Chalu v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:11 am
"   Comment:   This would changes the balance of power from the existing 9 Hollywood (all Membership First) v. 4 NY and regional to 9 Hollywood Membership First v. 2 Hollywood but not necessarily Membership First v. 6 NY and regional. [read post]