Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 5581 - 5600 of 23,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Yergin
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
But as the district court explained, "[n]ot having an answer to a specific question about effective alternatives to background checks does not imply anything about fitness to own a gun store and to sell guns. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
The answer is quite possibly yes.Applying the decision in Fenty and other v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd and Others, Federer could be in a position to bring an action in passing off, should Nike use the registered mark, on the basis that the impression is given that the goods are endorsed by Federer when in fact the association has finished. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:18 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The suit is for specific performance of an agreement to sell an immovable property and has been pending from 2011. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:08 am by Peter Mahler
The plaintiffs allege that the defendant managing members, instead of fulfilling their fiduciary duty at that point by selling the UES Building and distributing the net proceeds to members, continued to operate the business illegally for a time before defaulting on the mortgage, leading to a foreclosure action and a distressed sale of the property for less than market value. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 5:19 pm by Daily Record Staff
., LLC, the owner of a shopping center known as the “Golden Pond,” entered into an agreement with appellee, RLD Rental Properties Ltd.1 The agreement, which was captioned as a “letter of intent,” contemplated that appellant would sell the Golden Pond property ... [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 2:51 am by Florian Mueller
Under the headline "Qualcomm's Practice of Not Selling Chips to Unlicensed Companies Has Valid Business Justifications," paragraph 245 says:"Qualcomm's practice of not selling chips to unlicensed OEMs is based on the following considerations:"And then every single one of those business considerations is blackened out. 100%. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:55 pm by Florian Mueller
Netlist recently announced that it 'obtained outside investment to finance the legal fees and costs of its legal action against SK hynix” from TR Global Funding V, LLC. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by Mack Sperling
Judge Robinson boldly went where no North Carolina Judge writing published Opinions had gone before last month in the case of Wheeler v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  That’s the question the Delaware Chancery Court was recently called upon to answer in Great Hill Equity Partners v. [read post]