Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 6,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
A book roughly the size of, say, the UCC.I know a decent amount about intellectual property (though much less than my wife), but did not realize until this morning that the UCC -- including California's version of it -- has a fairly strong default value that the seller warrants that the products are delivered free of any infringement claims.And, in this opinion, Justice Irion makes this default warranty even more significant, holding that it extends even to unsuccessful claims of… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:38 pm
Although Justice Souter noted in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:44 am
The trial court asserted the post-taking sales were not relevant since post-taking sales would not be in the contemplation of a willing buyer and seller of the taken parcels. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:00 pm
In Budd v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 1:28 pm
In Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 9:47 pm
In Stambovsky v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 9:35 pm
That was the question in Bourgi v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards. 3) Its long-term effects. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Fusco, Jr. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 8:33 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:42 am
Sokol Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 2:08 am
Novelty Crystal Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:23 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
See Simone v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
The case I'm talking about is Western Filter Corp. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 11:29 am
The New York Court of Appeals recently accepted the following certified questions in Jaramillo v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
Sony Computer Entertainment UK Ltd and Another v Cinram Logistics UK Ltd Court of Appeal “A manufacturer and seller of goods who lost them through the fault of another before he could make delivery and earn the price could recover that price as damages for their loss. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:54 pm
Henkel Corp v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:47 am
Ward v. [read post]
