Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 5581 - 5600
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
In 2009, in Fawzy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 9:37 pm
§ 332(c)(7)(B)(iii), required that any decision by a state or local governing body be both in writing and supported by “substantial evidence” within the written record. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 3:08 pm
State-of-the-art at the time was 78s. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 11:19 am
By: Brandon C. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Case law’s most extensive treatment: Letterese v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
Peter Rehder v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:10 am
The fairness of any use has no set definition, but is assessed based on 6 non-exhaustive factors: a) purpose of the dealing, b) the character of the dealing, c) the amount of the dealing (amount of copying), d) alternatives to the dealing, e) the nature of the work, and f) the effect of the dealing on the work.As the threshold for establishing that a use falls under an authorized purpose is low, the Court quickly concluded that the use by York University was indeed for education. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 10:30 am
So held the unsurprising decision in Denison v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
But, Dis Vintage LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
At oral argument last week in Setser v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
By: Brandon C. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
As we stated in Kelly [Kelly v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:32 am
§ 1-26-704(a)(iii)(B) and (C) (LexisNexis 2011)D. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
The trial court’s inquiry of the defendant regarding her waiver of counsel satisfied the requirements of G.S. 15A-1242 and the pro se defendant’s failure to comply with Rule 4 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure did not warrant dismissal of her appeal State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Available-Domain-Names.com, d/b/a Intellectual-Assets.com, Inc., D2000-0120 (WIPO April 13, 2000) and EAuto, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:05 am
Works Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
Călinescu [IPKat here].Who owns the copyright(s) to the image(s)? [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:31 am
The COFC’s decision in Tolliver Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
