Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 5581 - 5600 of 29,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2021, 5:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Amicus Brief of the Alaska Federation of Natives Amicus Brief of the State of Alaska Amicus Briefs Supporting Respondents: Cert Stage Briefs Mnuchin v Chehalis Cert Petition Alaska Native Corps Cert Petition Members of Congress Amicus Brief State of Alaska Amicus Brief Chehalis Brief in Opposition Ute Tribe BIO Cheyenne River Sioux BIO ANVCA Reply Federal Petitioner’s Reply D.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
First, Roberts wrote a solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:43 am by Robbie Kenney
., State Senator Robert Singer has introduced a resolution urging Congress to call for an Article V Convention of States. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
On this episode, plaintiffs from the landmark case of Monroe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Gene Takagi
” NY Times“On social media, on cable networks and even in the halls of Congress, supporters of Donald J. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:14 am by Simon Young
According to Article 58 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China 1982, the National People’s Congress (NPC) and the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC) exercise the legislative power of the state. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d 282, 291,… [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am by Sarah Libowsky, Krista Oehlke
Expedited Removal Expedited removal, created by Congress in 1996, allows for the summary removal of asylum seekers without safeguards such as judicial review. [read post]