Search for: "State v. Core" Results 5581 - 5600 of 8,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm by Ilya Somin
In addition, if Amar is right that “Any law, state or federal, heaping disabilities or dishonor upon any citizen by dint of his or her birth status — because he was born black, or because she was born female or out of wedlock — violates a core principle of the Fourteenth Amendment’s opening sentence,” then laws denying the vote to women were banned by the Fourteenth Amendment, and there was no need for the Nineteenth Amendment (which finally banned sex… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging) In a recent posting, Ilya Somin says the following: “Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:16 am by Leland E. Beck
Complaint:  The Center for Food Safety and Center for Environmental Health v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:16 am by Leland E. Beck
Complaint:  The Center for Food Safety and Center for Environmental Health v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In Kansas v Hendricks, the Supreme Court held that it did not violate double jeopardy or substantive due process to commit a person indefinitely to a locked state-run facility after he had completed his maximum prison sentence. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:23 am by Rosalind English
 In Sahin v Turkey (2007) 44 EHRR 5 the Court assumed that the applicant? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of the key attorneys in the NY v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:30 pm by Lewis Lazarus
Lazarus This article was originally published in the Delaware Business Court Insider | September 5, 2012 Since Kahn v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am by assoulineberlowe
If the statement alleges that the proceeding is non-core, it shall state that the party does or does not consent to entry of final orders or judgment by the bankruptcy judge court. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:27 am by SHG
In a doctrinally bankrupt decision, the Supreme Court in Michigan Dep't of State Police v. [read post]