Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 2:08 am
".With the assistance of Google's online translation service this comes out in English as "The proprietor of the mark on a gas cylinder registered as a trade mark cannot oppose the sale of gas through another company, in copies of this bottle that the holder has previously put on the market when it is stated clearly enough that the gas sold does not come from the holder and there is no link with it".Unable to study the reasoning, the IPKat can at least… [read post]
11 May 2014, 2:37 am
In People v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:58 pm
” Our public defender system derives from the Constitution’s Sixth Amendment and the Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:32 am
If other public disclosures adequately inform security holders that particular transactions have occurred, further tolling of the time for bringing suit to disgorge profits from those transactions is unwarranted, concluded the brief.Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
That statute unquestionably states that, in order for an ISP to benefit from the Section 512(a) safe harbor for "Transitory Digital Network Communications," it must "adopt[] and reasonably implement[], and inform[] subscribers and account holders ... of, a policy that provides for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscribers and account holders of the service provider’s system or network who are repeat infringers. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Time had agreed to purchase the exclusive right to print prepublication excerpts from the copyright holders, Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
FDIC and Atherton v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 am
In Sisvel v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Farina, 13-1227, a state-on-top habeas case involving how much leeway a federal court is allowed in determining that a state court made an unreasonable factual determination; and Whitman v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:57 pm
Holder. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
Holder, Appeal No. 0120120821, decision (EEOC, Apr. 20, 2012). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
Holder, Appeal No. 0120120821, decision (EEOC, Apr. 20, 2012). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
June 24th - Global-Tech v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
., v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
June 24th - Global-Tech v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Oracle was not particularly happy with this state of affairs. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:37 am
The Access Copyright v. [read post]
