Search for: "State v. L. A. T."
Results 5581 - 5600
of 9,947
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
It also restricted competitive keyword advertising–”[l]awyers may not purchase the name of another lawyer or law firm as a key word in search engines”–even though it’s becoming increasingly clear over the years that such competitive keyword advertising purchases are legal and legitimate (see, e.g., Habush v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:38 am
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Nat’l Park Hospitality Ass’n v Dep’t of Interior, the appeals court noted that when an agency issues an interpretative rule or statement with respect to a matter that it is not empowered to decide, that statement merely informs the public of the agency’s views, and controversies over such statements typically cannot result in a justiciable dispute. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Service Employees Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
If this type of claim can’t survive even in the First Circuit, it doesn’t have much of a future – if it can’t make it there, it can’t make it anywhere. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Poss, Esquire, Kathryn L. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm
Applying these considerations to the case of a duty of care, it’s interesting to note the most recent argument in the FTC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
Jou v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
Google’s own amicus brief in this case states it receives &ldqu [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
Jorgensen, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 55, Corporation de l’École Polytechnique v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:14 pm
AmEx bolsters the Supreme Court’s previous AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
L. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
These women were turned away without a remedy’ (Governor's Memorandum approving L 2003, ch 69, 2003 N.Y. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
The following case, People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
Part V then considers the governance implications of the market activities of the NSWF. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Parents v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So concludes today’s Silvester v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 11:14 am
Rerum Gestarum, L. [read post]
