Search for: "State v. State"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 258,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2008, 4:15 am
" In contrast, although the ADEA does contain a clear congressional statement of intent to abrogate the States' immunity, the Supreme Court in Kimel v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:26 am
In Battery Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:20 am
Listen to this extended NPR discussion of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
[1] Facebook v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
[1] Facebook v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am
Trinity Lutheran of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
In all other states, Coleman v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:33 am
But as a general matter, its actions aren’t state action, and this I know because the Supreme Court tells me so, see NCAA v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
Dukes, Comcast v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States on May 26, 1875. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:23 am
In the case, Bostock v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:46 pm
In State of Utah v Cosby, the defendant appealed his probation sentence that also included jail time, claiming abuse of discretion by the trial court. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
In the pending investor-state-dispute-settlement case under an older but parallel North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) investment clause, an American pharmaceutical company, in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
And then a bunch of states, led by North Dakota, that didn't want the EPA to do anything intervened in the lawsuit.Hence why North Dakota leads the caption and argued the case. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 2:22 pm
Heller represented MCM v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In State of Washington v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Mount v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:10 am
A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India on Wednesday struck down a Maharashtra state government statute on reservation, a system of affirmative action in India, and upheld a 50 percent ceiling on it, in Dr Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
State Department’s mandatory retirement at age 65 of certain employees policy violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) Miller v Clinton, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #10-5405 The United States Department of State terminated the employment of John R. [read post]