Search for: "State v. White" Results 5581 - 5600 of 13,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
’s commitment to the Paris Accord is precisely the sort of “reliance interest” which, under the Supreme Court’s explanation in FCC v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:08 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Josh Blackman continued his analysis of the Fourth Circuit’s decision in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:31 am by Joy Waltemath
That candidate had a college degree, as required in the job description, and there was no evidence that this stated reason for hiring the other candidate was pretextual. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:28 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Jordan Brunner and Amira Mikhail summarized the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in IRAP v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 6:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the Supreme Court has made clear that the government cannot even impose viewpoint-based demonstration security fees, even when the demonstration has an overt white nationalist message (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
After all, Kennedy was elected by a Democratic coalition of White southerners, northern liberals, and Blacks that civil rights split wide open. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:44 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Confirming the correctness of my decision never to eat Oreo cookies, titanium dioxide is the pigment that makes the center of the Oreo white. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:02 pm by John Floyd
As Judge Cochran with the Court of Criminal Appeals said in Uribe v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]