Search for: "Washington v. Downes"
Results 5581 - 5600
of 5,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
(Vaden v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Compared to the death penalty or life in prison that he had been facing weeks earlier, it was a difficult offer to turn down but he did precisely that, because there were a couple of "catches" he and his lawyers refused to accept. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
” (One of the authors of the CORE brief is law professor Robert Cottroll of George Washington University — who also is cited as one of the authorities in the brief of the NAACP LDF.) [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:20 am
We Bone Screwers had just gotten a preemption ruling only a couple of months before that would have shut down about 85% of that mass tort. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
One need not even mention Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
On January 28, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal district court decision that had struck down most of the regulations on the sales of alcoholic beverages imposed by the State of Washington in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
A copy of the opinion can be read here: West One Automotive Group v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot provided the buyers with down payment and earnest money checks that listed the buyers as the remitters.[14] Rather, the buyers were not remitters and had not contributed any money toward a down payment or earnest money and caused these false down payment and earnest money checks to be presented at closings to deceive lenders by creating the false impression that the buyers had made down payments and had paid earnest money. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot provided the buyers with down payment and earnest money checks that listed the buyers as the remitters.[14] Rather, the buyers were not remitters and had not contributed any money toward a down payment or earnest money and caused these false down payment and earnest money checks to be presented at closings to deceive lenders by creating the false impression that the buyers had made down payments and had paid earnest money. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:03 am
Supreme Court considers extending protections to drug makers, International Herald Tribune, February 26, 2008 Top court rules for Medtronic in devices case, Washington Post, February 20, 2008 Related Web Resources: Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging… [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 3:41 am
Tallahassee Furniture Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Cir. 1998), and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Washington (2005) related to the permissibility of certain types of testimonial statements in criminal cases. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
