Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 6,255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2008, 9:16 pm
Orin Kerr at Volokh Conspiracy is asking students who have transferred law schools to talk about their experiences in the comments section to his post. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 10:36 am
There's some meaningful analogy in all this, no doubt, but I haven't clue what it is.And almost too trivial to mention, Volokh Conspirators Orin Kerr and Paul Cassell are mud-wrestling over how the exclusionary rule plays with originalists. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:59 pm
He quotes a law review article written by Orin Kerr, professor of law at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
Orin Kerr had a pro bono finger in the motion as well. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 11:23 pm
My colleague Ian Kerr posts a great speech he recently delivered on the importance of privacy "idealism" in advocacy. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
The case is Kerr et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:13 pm
KERR, George Washington University - Law SchoolSex Offender Issues, Research, Recidivism and the Truth [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:10 pm
ORIN KERR on why the United States has an exclusionary rule. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:33 am
So I thanked my lucky stars that Orin Kerr decided to step up to the plate and swing.Over at Volokh, Orin has hit a home run with his analysis of the exclusionary rule, from a historical originalist context, and made a great argument in favor of the judge-made remedy being fully consistent with how the founding fathers would have addressed the issue. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
Even my old stand-by, Orin Kerr, thought it was justified by historical experience. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:57 am
A debate is raging between Orin Kerr and Sasha Volokh over the distinction of "is" versus "ought" in constitutional law. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:56 pm
Orin Kerr & Sasha Volokh have an interesting exchange going on the is-ought distinction & the nature of (constitutional) law. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:50 pm
Kerr, from George Washington University, the articles introduces basic legal concepts needed to read a legal opinion and also offers advice on how to deal with your first few weeks of law school. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:50 pm
Kerr, from George Washington University, the articles introduces basic legal concepts needed to read a legal opinion and also offers advice on how to deal with your first few weeks of law school. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:50 pm
Kerr, from George Washington University, the articles introduces basic legal concepts needed to read a legal opinion and also offers advice on how to deal with your first few weeks of law school. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 12:50 pm
Kerr, from George Washington University, the articles introduces basic legal concepts needed to read a legal opinion and also offers advice on how to deal with your first few weeks of law school. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 12:50 pm
Kerr, from George Washington University, the articles introduces basic legal concepts needed to read a legal opinion and also offers advice on how to deal with your first few weeks of law school. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 12:23 pm
The first comment is from Orin Kerr. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:19 am
. - Brian Simpson, Leading Cases in the Common Law via Tax Stories by Paul CaronFor some good tips on how to be a legal archaeologist, read this excellent piece by Orin Kerr: How to Read a Legal Opinion: A Guide for New Law Students [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
Orin Kerr picked up immediately on David's "clearly establishes" claim, and disagreed. [read post]
