Search for: "B&B LLC" Results 5601 - 5620 of 12,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2016, 3:55 am
In re Austin Brothers’ Beer Company LLC, Serial No. 86545695 (December 13, 2016) [not precedential].Of course, the involved goods are identical, and there are no limitations on channels of trade or classes of consumers in the application or cited registrations. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:10 pm by Candace Shields
Specifically, in Analytic Strategies, LLC, B-413758.2 (Nov. 28, 2016), the GAO held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider a protest of a task order issued by the DoD under the GSA’s OASIS vehicle; in HP Enterprise Services, LLC, B-413382.2 (Nov. 30, 2016), the GAO made a similar finding with respect to a DoD order under the GSA ALLIANT IDIQ. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 7:22 am by Joy Waltemath
” In Brunswick Bowling Products, LLC, cited by both the majority and the dissent, the majority said it had not created a double standard because it had expressly found that “the Regional Director erred by receiving into evidence the Union’s statement of position and by not precluding the Union from raising the contract bar issue. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:34 pm by Mark Theodore
” The Board distinguished its prior ruling in Brunswick Bowling Products LLC, 364 NLRB No. 96 (August 25, 2016), where it held that the rules prohibited the Regional Director from accepting an untimely filed position statement but could nevertheless consider the issue because the rule in question there, 102.66(b) expressly granted such discretion. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
The seminar rounded off with Richard Davis covering the recent Meter-Tech LLC v British Gas Trading Limited [2016] EWHC 2278 (Pat) decision. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Smith, supra, at 462–63; see also Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:43 am
D Now filed a patent infringement action against defendants TPF Toys Limited and TPF Toys LLC (collectively "TPF"). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Brian pointed out that categories (a) and (b) are generally considered acceptable whereas category (c) will generally amount to an abuse of process. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:43 am by Andre Hanson (US)
The underlying case concerned two competing Colorado-based prefabricated steel building companies: General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC (“General Steel”) and Atlantic Building Systems, LLC, d/b/a Armstrong Steel Corporation (“Armstrong”). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:43 am by Andre Hanson (US)
The underlying case concerned two competing Colorado-based prefabricated steel building companies: General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC (“General Steel”) and Atlantic Building Systems, LLC, d/b/a Armstrong Steel Corporation (“Armstrong”). [read post]