Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 9,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:40 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:13 am
The Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages stated that she was bound by the Court of Appeal’s judgment in R v Registrar General, ex parte Segerdal [1970] 2 QB 697 to reject the appellant’s application to record such a church to marry in, as the authority held that Scientology did not involve “religious worship” since it did not involve “reverence or veneration of God or of a Supreme Being”, but rather instruction in a… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
Younger v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am
This did not extend to a right of access to information held by the State when the State was not willing to provide it. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
Part V then considers the governance implications of the market activities of the NSWF. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So concludes today’s Silvester v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
DR Horton DR Horton is a home builder with operations throughout the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:06 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:12 am
In Moge v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[v] More than 50 years later, the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm
The one case often pointed to by the “no exemptions for commercial activity” arguments is United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:36 am
But see United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:13 am
Alpha Pro Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
- Bernard Maister, Caspar van Woensel• Sport as a brand and its legal protection in South Africa - Owen Dean• Notes and updates• Comment on the Green Paper for post-school education and training - Shihaam Shaikh• Confusion and the bounds of trade mark monopolies: Foschini v Coetzee - Jeremy Speres• The panados and panadon’ts of trade mark registrations: recent developments regarding trademarks used in the pharmaceutical industry - Marius Roetz•… [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:21 pm
It may be worth noting that since the case concerned the relationship between Australia (as requesting State) and Latvia (as requested State), the special regime applying between member States of the EU bound by the Brussels IIbis Regulation was inapplicable. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
That is a view, though, that states continue to reject in large part, and that non-state actors sometimes view as irrelevant. [read post]
