Search for: "Childs v. Childs"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 12:25 am
In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:45 pm
G. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:42 pm
In an action for tuition reimbursement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), summary judgment for defendant department of education is affirmed where: 1) because the IDEA does not require that an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) name a specific school placement, plaintiff-child’s IEP was not procedurally deficient; and 2) there was substantial evidence [...] [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:35 am
Turner v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:35 am
Turner v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:52 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Desmond v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3 (12 January 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Guerrero & 30 Ors v Monterrico Metals Plc [2010] EWHC 3228 (QB) (15 December 2010) Ganz v Childs & Ors [2011] EWHC 13 (QB) (11 January 2011) Cambridge v Makin [2011] EWHC 12 (QB) (12 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Ferguson, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am
Abbott v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:02 am
Horn v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:10 pm
Louisiana and the Court's prohibition on the death penalty for child rape, but the opinion issued today which will likely have far more impact on criminal law is Giles v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:59 am
More on Coker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Indiana, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Indiana, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:59 am
Werdin appeals from a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, convicting him of forty-two[1] counts of possession of child pornography and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:27 am
AC33317 - Winters v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 2:00 pm
(Child Custody; Neglected Child) Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:25 am
While caseworkers who allegedly wrongfully remove a child from his home are not entitled to absolute immunity for their actions, the Second Circuit has asserted that they are entitled to qualified immunity, and upheld the ruling of a District Court (while disagreeing with it on the absolute immunity issue), dismissing an action for wrongul removal of a child.The decision in Cornejo v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 5:49 pm
Mintz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 5:49 pm
Mintz v. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 5:34 am
Servs. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:56 am
More on Coker v. [read post]
