Search for: "Cook v. Cook"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 5,903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2023, 8:28 am
” Cook County Court Rule 13.3.1(a) You have to be honest when filling out a financial affidavit in an Illinois divorce! [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
The women had little or no independent role; they were sex fodder, cooks, and drudges. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Sir James Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB), Jay J declined to draw an such an inference of serious harm where the contested publication was in a national newspaper. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Former President Donald Trump has promised voters that, if re-elected, he would “immediately” invoke the Alien Enemies Act to effect mass deportations of non-citizens from Mexico. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 10:28 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[40] What is Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome? [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 7:23 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 5:00 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Cambridge v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Pulte v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
Schwedt v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
Schwedt v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
On September 14, the Law Library held its annual Constitution Day event, which featured Harvard Law School Professor Mark V. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
See Madey v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 11:50 am
This sounds plausible, but it isn't difficult to cook up examples where this formula doesn't match our intuitive understanding of harm. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
