Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 5601 - 5620 of 32,295
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
The new law, House File 802, goes into effect July 1. [read post]
In a remarkable decision the German Federal Labour Court (BAG, 26.11.2020 – ref. 8 AZR 58/20) has fundamentally changed the case law with regard to the drafting of these clauses. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by SHG
” While the actual language might be too vulgar for the likes of the New York Times, it wasn’t for Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the 8-1 majority in Mahanoy Area School v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 3:58 am by Arlo Kipfer
If a company does not have a history you can verify, walk away. 8. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:30 pm by William K. Berenson
Here are just a few of of his client’s stories that will give you an insight into what he does 24/7. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:21 pm by Kevin
In an 8-1 decision, the Court held that while public schools may have a special interest in regulating some off-campus student speech, on the facts here the student’s interest in free expression outweighed the school’s interest in stifling it. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:09 pm
"Said Brandi Levy (now an 18-year-old college student), quoted in "Supreme Court sides with high school cheerleader in free-speech dispute over profane Snapchat rant" (WaPo).The decision is 8-1, with only Justice Thomas dissenting, and Justice Breyer writing the opinion about Levy's barbaric yawp: "Fuck school, fuck softball, fuck cheer, fuck everything. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 10:53 am by Paul S.O. Barbeau
Deceased’s great-nieces and nephews; 8. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:13 am by Amy Howe
But, by a vote of 8-1, the justices agreed with the cheerleader that her one-year suspension from the cheerleading team nonetheless violated the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 7:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The Court is unanimous that the relevant statutory claims should be dismissed, 8-1 on whether the plaintiffs here had standing and 7-2 on whether the for-cause limitation on removal of the FHFA director (with Kagan joining the conservatives only because of the precedential effect of Seila Law), the majority splinters on other issues. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 7:23 am by Michaela Ring (Hoffmann Eitle )
In addition, the BGH criticized the Appeal Court for focusing solely on the disputed product as a whole rather than on individual features of appearance thereof, which is what art. 8(1) CDR mentions. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 7:23 am by Michaela Ring (Hoffmann Eitle)
In addition, the BGH criticized the Appeal Court for focusing solely on the disputed product as a whole rather than on individual features of appearance thereof, which is what art. 8(1) CDR mentions. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
While Firm 1 does not pay corporate tax in its loss-making Year 1, it is subject to tax on the full $100,000 in profits in Year 2. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm by Patricia Hughes
(Decision #1, para.1) Decision #1 described Justice McLeod’s background based on an Agreed Statement of Facts. [read post]