Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 8,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:59 am
His decision on circuit in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm
For example, Davis, California, requires a 30-day interval between publication of a proposed privacy policy and impact report, and the city council’s subsequent hearing regarding the proposed surveillance technology.New York City’s Public Oversight of Surveillance (POST) Act is high on transparency, but wanting on democratic power. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
In RSPCA (NSW) v Davies [2011] NSWSC 1445, Latham J awarded the RSPCA in NSW damages of Aus$100,000 for defamatory material posted on a website authored by retired “forensic computer detective” Mal Davies. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm
The appeal is against the decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) of the Court of Appeal (MacFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) against the decision of Warby J on preliminary issues ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)). [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
City of Davis (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1004, 1015; Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
As mentioned above, on the same day a statement in open court was read out in the case of Davies v BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
Quintanilla v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
Shay asks whether more time should be put into teaching Brady, given the decision in Connick v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:16 pm
In Bezirdjian v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
On 1 April 2015, Nicola Davies J will hand down judgment in Lachaux v AOL Ltd.. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
IPSO 20964-23 The Irish Football Association v Sunday Life, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 22008-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (East), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 22867-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (West), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 0825-23 Revell v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 21074-23… [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
Davis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:19 am
In Fry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
The actual statement by the Court of Appeals in McCaskey, Davies & Assoc. v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
” At National Law Review, Donald Davis looks at the court’s decision last week in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
