Search for: "Davis v. State" Results 5601 - 5620 of 6,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2008, 3:13 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in 1990, Alito has now led a majority to condemn in dispassionate terms in Davis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:09 pm
Justice Alito notes that this is very different from the public funds limitations imposed by the FECA and discussed in Buckley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
A recent graduate from Catholic University's School of Law, Elizabeth Getman, at the ripe old age of 27, is already serving as co-counsel to Andrew Herman of the Bland Law Group in DC as he argues the case of Jack Davis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
   The others still pending are cases on the constitutionality of the so-called “Millionaire’s Amendment” on campaign finance (Davis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Alexander Aleinikoff (Georgetown), Hiram Chodosh (Utah), Nora V. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The move by Simpson Thacher follows that by Davis Polk & Wardwell, which last month hired former federal prosecutor Ronnie Abrams to fill a similar role. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Davis, No. 07-10177 An Anders motion to withdraw as counsel by defendant's federal public defender is denied without prejudice where: 1) counsel's Acquaye statement did not indicate that he had consulted with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) as to defendant's case; 2) there was no indication that the USAO will enforce the appellate waiver; and 3) counsel could not simply rely on the USAO's statement that they will enforce the appeal waiver in all… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (2001) -- state actionStenberg v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Donnell Dingle Subscription Required BRONX COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Permits State's Counsel To Be Present, Videotape Psychiatric Exam of Respondent Matter of State of New York v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
  "Plaintiff has stated a cause of action for legal malpractice by alleging that "but for" defendant's failure to prepare and procure documents necessary to provide him with a first-priority security interest, he would have been able to recover the amounts owed to him by the defaulting borrower (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]