Search for: "Doe v. Smith"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Here are the latest four InFuse victories.Truthful v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
Judge Kara Stoll agreed explaining that at certain points in her career she had to make decisions about what path she wanted to pursue - litigation v prosecution, district v appellate work - and that required active decision making. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:50 am
V. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:32 am
What kind of regulatory philosophy does the proposal reflect? [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
So, he says that Nixon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about early… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
Does that mean the third time’s the charm? [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
See Knick v. [read post]
“Copyright law serves public ends by providing individuals with an incentive to pursue private ones”
16 Mar 2015, 5:13 am
In US v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
” Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:12 am
After the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in All American Check Cashing, the Fifth Circuit granted the petition for en banc review in Collins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court stated in Schick v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Smith, an economist at the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:37 pm
Smith, dissented. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
In a separate dissent, Judge Milan Smith—observing that “this dispute ceased being a typical employment dispute and metastasized into one of those cases that only Franz Kafka could love,”—argued that the majority’s conclusion was based primarily on a series of highly speculative future professional restraints that may or may not happen (Golden v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
Katz v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Gravel v. [read post]
