Search for: "Does 1 through 15" Results 5601 - 5620 of 13,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2020, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
She was subsequently convicted under Section 60(1) of the Crimes Ordinance for using a computer with criminal intent. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 5:43 am by Chris Seaton
After all, we’re called counselors for a reason. 1) Do you pay your bills on time or up front and in full? [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:01 am by jonathanturley
” That does not sit well with the most rabid activists who spent years demonizing Barr and others. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On November 7, the jury awarded $2 million in damages against the reporter, and $1 million against Rolling Stone for republishing the libel in a correction that did not retract or delete several of the defamatory allegations made against the plaintiff. [read post]
11 May 2016, 5:47 pm by John A. Gallagher
 During the first 15 years of my career, I have virtually no exposure to  Pennsylvania's Unemployment Compensation Law. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:06 am by Bill Marler
Salmon received all the credit.[1] Today, the number of known serotypes of Salmonella bacteria totals over two thousand. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:50 am by Mark Myles
  Overturning the previous rulings, it held that the crossing rules do apply and nothing within the COLREGS alleviates the give-way vessel (here Alexandra 1) from its obligation to keep out of the way of the stand-on vessel (here Ever Smart) simply because it is stopped or moving slowly through the water. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The SOE does not easily fit within the classical division of obligation, expressed in political and legal theory, between public and private entities, and their respective relationship to law.[3] States have a duty which is undertaken through law;[4] enterprises have a responsibility which is embedded in their governance.[5] These fundamental divisions form part of the current international efforts to institutionalize human rights related norms on and through states and… [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am by Robert J. Reinstein
To put it another way, does Section 3 only state grounds for expulsion, or does it also impose a disqualification requirement? [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:12 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  This subsection does not entitle the person's spouse or other dependent or family member to group health benefit plan coverage. [read post]