Search for: "Does 1-80" Results 5601 - 5620 of 6,385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
REASON The product does not meet specifications, as it has a low pH and contains undeclared ingredients. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm by Brian Shiffrin
People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780,783 (1992); People v Thompson, 91 AD2d 672 (2nd Dept. 1982), modified 60 NY2d 513 (1983); People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 (2nd Dept. 1982). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:43 pm by Geoffrey Manne
So does the Intel/AMD settlement raise issues under Section 1? [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:54 am
Not quite "Who's Bashing Whom," perhaps, but it does bring back memories of the early 1990s. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:54 pm
(What, then, does “objective” mean? [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
" **A footnote on costs involved in food discounting programs-- Food fight: Burger King franchisees sue chain: The National Franchise Association, a group that represents more than 80 percent of Burger King's U.S. franchise owners, said the $1 promotion forces restaurant owners to sell the quarter-pound burger with at least a 10-cent loss. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:34 pm
You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:26 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Now, when a contractor does this, there is this thing called the False Claims Act with which it has to deal. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:15 pm
In a deadly serious satire requesting that I be appointed law school industry czar, I point out how law schools have failed not only their students but also the public as in selective schools 95% of the graduates take positions representing the wealthiest 1% of the society while the 45,000,000 least wealthy of us cannot retain the services of a lawyer for 80% of their legal problems. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:07 am
The news will be who is "not" there at sentencing. [2] Does anyone like Scott? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:01 pm by Chuck Becker
What they mean is that so long as it does not cost them any money, they will be supportive. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
This principle emerged from [T 4/80,]the very first decision allowing the introduction of a disclaimer into a claim. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
This is the description of the second panel, featuring (among others) Judge Jeremy Fogel: Blogging, Tweeting: New Media in the Courtroom: Who qualifies as a journalist and does it really matter anymore? [read post]